I have to admit, the resignation of the head of London’s police was not the next move I expected. He accepted no responsibility for the stunningly suspicious web of relations between papers and police however, but only claimed that media coverage around these events would be too distracting while he was trying to oversee policing for the Olympics.
The Olympics. A world-class excuse for a world-class scandal. Does he think the media will be less curious about his successor? His own second in command was more deeply implicated than himself.
Rebekah Brooks’ arrest of course comes as less of a surprise, though one hopes she is not made the scapegoat for a what appears to be a long-established cosiness between News International and the Metropolitan Police. You can easily imagine how they’ve grown close over the years; maybe Scotland Yard giving Wapping the odd tip-off, maybe the papers spiking the odd story that didn’t reflect well on the Boys in Blue. Such a relationship must be nearly inevitable when people work side-by-side, investigating the same events in the same city. They may even be useful in the solving of crime at times. But the risk of corruption is obvious and enormous.
3 replies on “How Compromised Were The Police?”
In trying to distance themselves from their UK counterparts the US based NewsCorp outfits prove once again that the rot is widespread.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303661904576451812776293184.html?mod=djkeyword
Wow. Was there ever anything as transparently tacked-on as the last paragraph of that Wall Street Journal rant? “Word from on high is that today we are humble. Put this humble on.”