Categories
Cosmography

Spontaneous Human Combustion

The alleged SHC victims is almost always alone, even in fictional accounts like this one of Dickens'. How come?

West Galway coroner Dr. Ciaran MacLoughlin has ruled the death of a pensioner to be Spontaneous Human Combustion. This follows his finding of a 2009 murder-suicide to be the action of “shape-shifting beings of intelligent energy”, his 2005 decision that a local man’s disappearance was caused by him being “simply pulled down into Hell”, and his opinion that the 1998 death of a lorry driver was caused by something that “mortal man wots naught therof”.

OK I made those up, but they really are no more silly than a verdict of spontaneous human combustion, a thing not recognised by science to actually f***ing exist. A coroner has entered, as the official cause of death, that a person… burst into flames.

Let’s get this clear:

Spontaneous combustion is a real – and quite ordinary – thing. It simply means that substances can catch light without any flame being introduced. This can happen in a variety of ways, heat generated by decomposition in compost heaps being a common example.

Human combustion is a real thing too. Human bodies can burn; we cremate them all the time. Though we aren’t exactly highly inflammable, it doesn’t take a terribly big fire to entirely consume a body. Our Neolithic ancestors would do it with simple pyres of wood.

Spontaneous human combustion is when a human bursts into flame without any external cause, and this… just doesn’t happen. It’s been a thing of legend for some time, and has been popularised in fiction – most significantly, Charles DickensBleak House. The theory, perhaps “legend” would be a better word, is that some strange chemical change in the body causes it to catch light all by itself. Nobody has ever managed to recreate such a chemical reaction though.

What get labelled ‘spontaneous’ human combustion are cases where a body is found mostly or partially burned away without being on a pyre of any kind. It’s shocking, but should we really be surprised? We are partly inflammable bodies wrapped in often quite inflammable clothing. It’s perhaps surprising that we don’t catch fire more often.

There is no reason to believe that there was anything spontaneous about these conflagrations. Such bodies are often found in front of an open fire, very often the victim is a smoker. (It’s perhaps telling that reports of SHC begin only after the introduction of tobacco.) To my knowledge there has never been a case where an external source of ignition could be ruled out. Certainly not this one, where the victim was found near both matches and an open fire. (Investigators merely said that the fire did not spread from the hearth.)

Another telling thing that all these cases have in common: The victims are alone. Usually too they are very old or otherwise incapacitated (the victim in this case had type 2 diabetes, so coma is a possibility), and it seems likely that in many of these cases they are dead before the fire starts. Something sets their clothing (or the chair they are in) alight; perhaps the cigarette they were smoking, perhaps the heat of the open fire. Normally when things start to smoulder we react instinctively and quickly, but if the victim is dead or deeply unconscious and alone there is a small but real chance that smouldering can break into fire. It seems clothing fires can sometimes reach sufficient temperature to make the body’s own fats start to burn, whereupon it will to a greater or lesser extent consume itself. Animal fats make excellent fuels.

Why doesn’t the house burn down? Often it does, and so becomes another ordinary house fire caused by another ordinary stray cigarette. Just occasionally though the victim isn’t near anything the fire can spread to, and you get horrifying scenes like this.

Pathologist Professor Grace Callagy made the correct call – it was impossible to say the exact cause of death because too much of the body had been consumed by fire. We simply don’t know if he was already dead when the burning started. So for the coroner to return “spontaneous human combustion” as cause of death is quite simply ludicrous.

Prepared to be laughed at, fellow Galwegians. For this makes us look like a bunch of nineteenth-century bog goblins.

28 replies on “Spontaneous Human Combustion”

Oh, you honestly had me for the whole of that first paragraph! Dammit, my hopes for unprofessional coronorism were clearly too high.

Oh, you honestly had me for the whole of that first paragraph! Dammit, my hopes for unprofessional coronorism were clearly too high.

I sometimes wonder whether high levels of alcohol, especially spirits, might be related to cases of “spontaneous” combustion. Suppose one spent an evening drinking high-proof vodka and due to impairment also spilled this on their clothing: you’d be turning yourself into a walking human molotov cocktail, wouldn’t you?

I want to be careful not to cast any aspersions here. While it would be easy to assume that a 76-year-old Connemara man living alone would be inclined to alcohol, there’s nothing to support that in any report.

Also, I suspect that may be something of a folk explanation. Fictional victims like Krook in Bleak House are heavy drinkers, but it’s a possibility that this is a Victorian mixture of explication and moralization. Alcohol is volatile and will evaporate from clothes quite soon, and is there any evidence that either long term or recent heavy alcohol input changes how flammable human tissue is? A blood alcohol content of anything one part in 200 is normally fatal.

While there are theories that some abuses or illnesses could make flesh more combustible, I don’t see any real evidence. I strongly suspect the simple truth is that it’s easier to kindle a human body, when that body is unable to react to protect itself, than we expect or are comfortable with. The “wicking” experiments seem to bear that out.

Alcohol is volatile and will evaporate from clothes quite soon

Depending on ventilation of the room, might this not actually be an extra risk factor, rather than a mitigating factor? A good alcohol/air mixture can be very flammable.

@ dublinfollies – From Connemara originally, but died in Ballybane. So the BBC were OK.

The Telegraph on the other hand got his name wrong…

@azijn – Intriguingly, a well-ventilated room seems to be a common factor in a lot of these cases. Very frequently they occur near a fireplace. Surprise.

Besides, if you’ve ever set fire to yourself with alcohol (what, never?) you’ll have found that it burns fairly cool. I’ve no doubt it could be an accelerant in some of these cases, but I don’t think it’s by any means a universal cause. Certainly it wasn’t here, as the forensic team found no trace of an accelerant. And without any experimental evidence I have to remain highly dubious about the idea that alcohol intake makes humans into better fuel.

I always thought that Dickens had fierce neck, getting rid of an inconvenient character using SHC. I suppose he did have a deadline…

I always thought that Dickens had fierce neck, getting rid of an inconvenient character using SHC. I suppose he did have a deadline…

[…] A couple of months back I was horrified by a coroner here in Galway describing a case of a body catching fire as “spontaneous human combustion”. Working on a comparable case, Professor Cassidy took the opportunity to call that description a myth. And as State Pathologist – and a professor of forensic medicine – she is perhaps better qualified on the subject than a GP. […]

[…] A couple of months back I was horrified by a coroner here in Galway describing a case of a body catching fire as “spontaneous human combustion”. Working on a comparable case, Professor Cassidy took the opportunity to call that description a myth. And as State Pathologist – and a professor of forensic medicine – she is perhaps better qualified on the subject than a GP. […]

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: